Daimlerchrysler Corporation, Petitioner v. Bill Inman, David Castro, and John Wilkins, Each Individually and On…

Summary

The Texas Supreme Court held that the named plaintiffs lacked standing because their alleged injury was too speculative, so the court lacked subject‑matter jurisdiction and the case was dismissed. The Court reversed the appellate court’s certification order and declined to address choice‑of‑law issues. Justice Hecht’s majority opinion was contested by a dissent that argued the plaintiffs did have standing.