Universal Services Company, Inc., Petitioner v. Huy Hieng Khaov Ung, Respondents

Summary

The Texas Supreme Court held that the evidence was not legally sufficient to support the jury's finding of gross negligence by Universal Services and therefore reversed the Court of Appeals, entering judgment that respondents take nothing. The Court also found that Universal failed to preserve error regarding the trial court's refusal to define negligence and ordinary care. A dissenting opinion argued the majority erred in finding no evidence of gross negligence.