Texas Supreme Court
George H. Chambers, D.o., Petitioner v. Christine Conaway, Raymond Conaway, Respondents
April 20, 1994883 S.W.2d 156
Summary
The Texas Supreme Court affirmed the Court of Appeals' reversal and remand, holding that Dr. Chambers was not entitled to summary judgment on the statute of limitations defense because the evidence showed the alleged breach occurred within two years of filing. The Court also noted that determining when treatment ends is a question of law, not fact. Separate opinions include a dissent by Justice Hecht, a dissent by Justice Enoch, and a concurrence by Justice Gonzalez, each addressing the limitations period and duty of follow‑up care.