City of San Antonio, Relator v. Fourth Court of Appeals, Respondent

Summary

The Texas Supreme Court held that the City of San Antonio’s notice satisfied the Texas Open Meetings Act’s subject‑matter and posting requirements, and therefore the district court did not abuse its discretion in issuing writs of possession. Accordingly, the Court conditionally granted the City’s petition for mandamus and vacated the Court of Appeals’ judgment. Justice MAUZY, Justice DOGGETT (joined by Justice GAMMAGE), and Justice GONZALEZ each dissented, arguing that the notice was inadequate and that the City should not receive mandamus relief.