Doris McKinney, Petitioner v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Respondent

Summary

The Texas Supreme Court affirmed the Court of Appeals' judgment, holding that the petitioner's objection to an undisclosed fact witness was sufficiently specific to preserve error and that the admission of the witness's cumulative testimony was not reversible error. Justice Ray filed a concurring opinion, agreeing with the result but emphasizing the strict application of Peeples regarding the duty to request a hearing on discovery objections.