Ramon Escobar, Petitioners v. Rodolfo Escobar, Respondents

Summary

The Texas Supreme Court held that the trial court correctly used a judgment nunc pro tunc to correct a clerical error in the acreage of tract 38 and reversed the Court of Appeals, remanding the case. It also affirmed that appellate review of the trial court's factual finding on whether a prior judgment was rendered is limited to a lack‑of‑evidence standard.