Ashford Development, Inc., Petitioner v. Uslife Real Estate Services Corporation, Respondents

Summary

The Texas Supreme Court reversed the trial court and Court of Appeals, holding that the lender’s added street‑completion requirement was a counter‑offer, not a permissible supplemental provision, entitling Ashford to a refund of its $11,000 application fee and relieving Carruth of any brokerage fee, and remanded for determination of reasonable attorney’s fees.