Clendonio R. Mendoza, Petitioner v. Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc., Respondent

Summary

The Texas Supreme Court affirmed the trial court's judgment for Mendoza, holding that his lay testimony that he was totally unable to work prior to the Board's award was not a clear, unequivocal quasi‑admission that rises to the level of a judicial admission, and therefore did not bar his claim for increased benefits.