The State of Texas, Petitioner v. Frank K. Meyer, Respondents

Summary

The Texas Supreme Court affirmed the lower courts, holding that the trial court properly granted the motion in limine and excluded evidence concerning the respondents' remaining land and access rights, that expert testimony considering the remainder was inadmissible, that the engineer’s testimony and highway plans were immaterial, that a pro rata valuation method is improper, and that comparable fee‑simple sales were admissible.