Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, Petitioner v. George McCardell, Respondent

Summary

The Texas Supreme Court affirmed the Court of Civil Appeals' judgment, holding that the trial court erred in overruling the respondent's special exception and motion in limine but that those errors were harmless, and that the admission of documents relating to other injuries was proper. Separate concurring and concurring‑in‑part opinions noted disagreement on the admissibility of the documentary evidence.