Alamo Express, Incorporated v. Union City Transfer

Summary

The Texas Supreme Court affirmed the Court of Civil Appeals, holding that the Railroad Commission properly consolidated the applications, acted within its jurisdiction, and issued an order supported by substantial evidence that complied with the statutory requirements of Article 911b, including the mandated findings of fact; the Court also rejected the common carriers' request for a declaratory judgment. Justice Calvert dissented, arguing the wholesale amendment lacked substantial evidence.