Richard Lynn Winfrey, Appellant v. the State of Texas

Summary

The Court of Criminal Appeals reversed the conviction and entered an acquittal because the evidence, including a dog‑scent lineup, appellant's statements, and hearsay from a cellmate, was legally insufficient to support a murder conviction. A concurring opinion joined the majority, noting that even if the dog‑scent testimony were admissible under Rule 702, it remains insufficient.