Jaime Charles Nonn, Appellant v. the State of Texas

Summary

The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the conviction of Jaime Charles Nonn, holding that the admission of his out-of-state confession, which failed to substantially comply with Article 38.22, was harmless error and did not affect his substantial rights. The Court also rejected his equal‑protection claim, finding he was not similarly situated to his co‑defendant. The decision rests on a proper harm analysis under Rule 44.2(b).