Arthur Garcia Sanchez, Appellant v. the State of Texas

Summary

The Court held that the appellant failed to preserve his claim that the indictment omitted the required culpable mental state, rejecting the "right not recognized" doctrine as inapplicable. It also found the Court of Appeals erred in its harmless‑error analysis of the indictment defect concerning notice of statutory elements. Accordingly, the Court vacated the appellate judgment and remanded for a proper harm analysis.