Zedric Miller, Appellant v. the State of Texas

Summary

The Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas held that the trial court properly exercised its discretion to cumulate Zedric Miller's sentence because Miller's counsel admitted the prior convictions, satisfying the evidentiary requirement under article 42.08(a) as interpreted in Turner. Accordingly, the Court set aside the Court of Appeals' modification of the cumulative sentencing order and affirmed the judgment.