Jose Ricardo Castillo, Appellant v. the State of Texas, Appellee

Summary

The Court held that Garrett v. State overrules Caldwell v. State, so a venireman who refuses to convict on the basis of a single eyewitness is not challengeable for cause when the refusal stems from a higher reasonable‑doubt threshold; it vacated the Court of Appeals judgment and remanded for further application of that standard. Separate dissents (Mansfield and Keller) argue Caldwell remains controlling and would affirm the judgment, while a concurrence (Baird) agrees Garrett controls but says the cases can be reconciled.