Donald Wayne Engelking, Appellant v. the State of Texas, Appellee

Summary

The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed that Article 4476-15, §4.04(d)(2) is not void for vagueness despite lacking definitions for "adulterants" and "dilutants," and reversed the conviction because the evidence was insufficient to prove possession of over 400 grams of methamphetamine when the weight of alleged adulterants and dilutants could not be established; the case was remanded for a judgment of acquittal.