Ex Parte Michael John Renier

Summary

The Court dismissed the applicant's post‑conviction habeas corpus application because Article 11.07, §§2‑3, requires a final felony conviction and confinement, which were absent; the Court also rejected the reliance on Ormsby and held that relief for collateral consequences must be sought in district courts under Article V, §8. Justice Teague dissented, arguing jurisdiction existed, while Judge Onion concurred in the dismissal.