Raymond Beltran & David Romo, Appellant v. the State of Texas, Appellee

Summary

The Court affirmed the arson conviction, holding that the evidence was sufficient to infer appellant's intent to damage the building, that the burned jail rule book was admissible as non‑hearsay circumstantial evidence, and that the excluded testimony of Sergeant Sigler was irrelevant. The judgment of the trial court was therefore affirmed.