Larry Edward Henriksen, Appellant v. the State of Texas, Appellee

Summary

The Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas affirmed the robbery conviction, holding that none of the appellant's eleven raised errors—including juror excusal, denial of depositions, bond refusal, witness consultation, investigative expenses, identification procedures, best evidence rule application, and extraneous offense evidence—constituted reversible error. Justice Morrison filed a concurring opinion noting factual similarities that distinguished the case from Ford v. State.