Heinle v. Heinle

Summary

The North Dakota Supreme Court affirmed the denial of Timothy Lamb’s application for a writ of mandamus and motion to reconsider. It held that Lamb lacked a clear legal right to records concerning the administration and grading of the bar examination because Admission to Practice Rule 13 validly made those records confidential and was not displaced by the public-records provisions. The Court concluded the district court did not abuse its discretion. No separate opinions were filed.