Merryl Kihl, Appellant v. Karl O. Pfeffer, Defendants, and Honda Motor Co., Inc., Respondent

Summary

The New York Court of Appeals affirmed the Appellate Division, holding that service of the March 31, 1997 order on the plaintiff's counsel was proper, that the denial of receipt did not create a factual issue requiring a hearing, and that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the complaint for failure to comply with the discovery order.