New York Court of Appeals

David Risley, Respondent v. the Phenix Bank of the City of New York, Appellant

January 18, 188183 N.Y. 318

Summary

The Court affirmed the judgment, holding that a verbal promise to pay a check does not create a cause of action, that an oral assignment of a portion of a debt is valid when supported by consideration, and that the record of confiscation proceedings was not a permissible defense because the acts did not divest the plaintiff's prior title and the district court lacked jurisdiction over corporate property.