McCaul v. Wells Fargo Bank

Summary

The Supreme Court of Montana affirmed dismissal with prejudice of McCaul’s amended complaint under Rule 12(b)(6). It held that McCaul could not prosecute contract claims belonging to his business entities, failed to plead viable whistleblower, False Claims Act, or abuse-related claims, and filed any other potential claims after the applicable limitations periods had expired. The court also upheld denial of leave to amend because McCaul did not show how amendment could cure the defects.