People v. Armogeda

Summary

The Michigan Supreme Court held that when a sentencing court relies on inaccurately scored sentencing guidelines and the resulting sentence falls outside the corrected guidelines range, the defendant is entitled to resentencing, even if the trial court indicated it would impose the same sentence on remand. The Court affirmed that People v Francisco is not in conflict with People v Lockridge and reversed the Court of Appeals, remanding for resentencing.