Richard Nesbit v. Government Employees Insurance Company

Summary

The Court of Appeals of Maryland held that Nesbit's written waiver of personal injury protection benefits remained effective through policy renewals and changes in covered vehicles unless he withdrew it in writing. The court also held that GEICO's three-page waiver form satisfied the statutory disclosure requirements and that the evidence supported the finding that Nesbit received and signed a valid waiver. The judgment for GEICO was therefore affirmed.