In the Interest of L.m., Minor Child, K.l., Mother

Summary

The Supreme Court of Iowa vacated the court of appeals’ decision and affirmed termination of the mother’s parental rights. It held that clear and convincing evidence showed the child could not be returned to the mother at the time of the termination hearing, and that the mother’s challenge to the adequacy of reunification services was untimely because she did not object when the services were provided. The court also concluded termination served the child’s best interests because the child needed immediate permanency and stability. Chief Justice Cady, dissenting, would have continued the placement for six months because the mother had not received a meaningful opportunity for visitation and reunification services.