Kenneth Brown, Appellant (defendant Below) v. State of Indiana, Appellee (plaintiff Below)

Summary

The Indiana Supreme Court held that Brown did not preserve his challenge to the admission of evidence seized from his home because he affirmatively stated that he had no objection when the evidence was offered at trial. The Court further held that the alleged unlawful seizure, without an additional circumstance such as fabrication, willful misconduct, or denial of a fair trial, did not constitute fundamental error. The convictions and sentence were affirmed without deciding whether the search itself violated either constitution.