Drackett Products Co. v. Blue

Summary

The Florida Supreme Court held that the trial court was correct in excluding the mother's speculative testimony about what she would have done had she read the full label, and therefore quashed the appellate court's reversal and directed affirmation of the trial court's judgment. The Court emphasized that conjecture and speculation concerning a witness's state of mind are inadmissible, and declined to follow precedents that it found factually distinguishable.