Bruce Norton v. Joseph Adams

Summary

The Court affirmed dismissal with prejudice of Norton's amended civil-rights complaint and denial of his motion for a preliminary injunction. It concluded that none of Norton's appellate arguments showed reversible error, and that the proposed claims and requested relief remained legally deficient, including because the alleged state-court errors did not plausibly establish a due-process violation. The Court also held that any error in the District Court's treatment of Norton's objections was harmless because the Court independently reviewed the issues de novo.