United States v. Miroslaw Krejza

Summary

The court affirmed Krezja’s convictions for conspiracy and aiding and abetting embezzlement. It held that the government’s proof remained consistent with the indictment, that sufficient circumstantial evidence supported the jury’s findings of knowing participation and criminal intent, and that the district court did not commit reversible evidentiary error. The court also concluded that any evidentiary error would have been harmless because the government presented substantial independent evidence of intent to defraud.