US Inventor, Inc. v. Squires

Summary

The court affirmed dismissal of the inventors’ complaint for lack of Article III standing. The organizations did not plausibly allege an imminent future injury because their claimed diversion of resources was indirect and did not directly interfere with core organizational activities, and their members either lacked a future injury or were not identified as the basis for standing. The court also affirmed denial of leave to amend because the proposed amendment would not cure the absence of allegations showing an imminent future injury.