United States v. David Remigio

Summary

The court affirmed the restitution order after concluding that Remigio failed to establish plain error in the $3,000 award to Audrey. Although the record did not include evidence of Audrey’s specific losses and the Government might need to prove those losses on remand, Audrey was a known victim and the plea agreement and governing law required at least $3,000 per victim. The court also rejected Remigio’s challenges to the restitution procedures because any error was not clear or obvious and did not warrant discretionary correction.