Wyoming Supreme Court
Kilen Patrick Dysthe, Appellant (defendant) v. the State of Wyoming, Appellee (plaintiff)
February 19, 200363 P.3d 875
Summary
The Wyoming Supreme Court reversed Dysthe’s conviction for delivery of cocaine and remanded for a new trial. It held that the trial court abused its discretion by excluding defense witnesses relevant to impeaching the State’s principal witness and by restricting cross-examination concerning the foundation for another witness’s drug-identification opinion; the prosecutor also committed plain error by vouching for the State’s witnesses. The court concluded these errors were not harmless because the State’s case depended entirely on witness credibility.