Michael Alexander Gleason, Appellant (defendant) v. the State of Wyoming, Appellee (plaintiff)

Summary

The court affirmed Gleason’s convictions, holding that the trial court properly admitted uncharged misconduct evidence for permissible purposes after conducting the required relevance and prejudice analysis. It also rejected Gleason’s prosecutorial-misconduct claim under plain-error review and concluded that counsel was not ineffective because Gleason knowingly and voluntarily waived his presence during peremptory challenges. No separate opinions were filed.