State of Utah, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Carl Alton Winfield, Defendant and Appellant

Summary

The Utah Supreme Court affirmed Winfield's aggravated-robbery conviction without reaching the merits of either appellate claim. It held that Winfield invited any voir-dire error by affirmatively accepting the jury panel and that he failed to preserve his insufficiency-of-the-evidence claim because neither his pretrial bindover challenge nor his later statements specifically renewed that objection. There were no separate opinions.