Phyllis Paige Brown, Appellant v. Suzanne Nicholson, Glenda Pate, and Ken Spears, Appellees

Summary

The Supreme Court held that summary judgment was improper because Brown’s status as a licensee or invitee and the open‑and‑obvious nature of the ramp defect are genuine issues of fact. Accordingly, the Court vacated the Court of Civil Appeals’ opinion, reversed the trial court’s summary judgment, and remanded for further proceedings.