The State of New Hampshire v. Paul Blackmer

Summary

The court affirmed the defendant’s conviction and sentence for conspiracy to possess marijuana with intent to sell. It held that the delayed disclosure of unrelated grand-jury testimony did not implicate the speedy-trial right, that a conspiracy may exist even when the alleged co-conspirator lacks criminal intent or immunity from prosecution, and that New Hampshire law governed sentencing and supplied jurisdiction. The court declined to consider additional arguments that were unpreserved, inadequately developed, or omitted from the notice of appeal.