Certified Fire Protection, Inc., a Nevada Corporation v. Precision Construction, Inc., a Nevada Corporation Arthur…

Summary

The court affirmed judgment for Precision because Certified failed to prove either an enforceable express or implied-in-fact contract for design-only services and failed to show that Precision received a benefit supporting restitutionary quantum meruit or unjust enrichment. The court also affirmed the denial of attorney fees because the district court acted within its discretion in finding the offer of judgment unreasonable and the mechanic's lien claim reasonably based. No separate opinions were filed.