State v. Meggerson

Summary

The court affirmed Meggerson's convictions, holding that the evidence was sufficient to support his attempted capital murder conviction and that his remaining sufficiency claims were waived because they were not adequately briefed. It also upheld admission of the cell-phone evidence, jail calls, prior-crimes evidence, and investigative timelines, finding either that Meggerson failed to provide an adequate appellate record or that the district court acted within its discretion. Because the court found no individual errors, it rejected the cumulative-error claim.