State of Kansas, Appellee v. Cameron Lee Johnson, Appellant.

Summary

The court affirmed the consecutive sentences for felony murder and aggravated kidnapping because Johnson failed to preserve his challenge to the sentencing judge's reliance on facts outside the record and did not explain why an exception to the preservation rule should apply. It held that the district court lacked jurisdiction to impose restitution later because it neither expressly continued nor bifurcated sentencing, and it vacated the restitution notation. The court also vacated lifetime postrelease supervision as illegal and corrected the ambiguous criminal-possession sentence to run concurrently with the other three sentences. No separate opinions were filed.