Christopher Bailey, Appellant (defendant Below) v. State of Indiana, Appellee (plaintiff Below)

Summary

The Indiana Supreme Court reinstated Bailey's convictions for battery and disorderly conduct, holding that the evidence was sufficient for a factfinder to conclude that he knowingly touched an assistant principal in a rude, insolent, or angry manner and engaged in tumultuous conduct likely to result in serious bodily injury. The court applied the sufficiency-of-the-evidence standard without reweighing evidence or judging credibility. No separate opinions were filed.