State of Arizona, Appellee v. Mark Goudeau, Appellant

Summary

The opinion addresses challenges to the search of Goudeau’s home, consumptive DNA testing, joinder and severance, counsel, trial-management procedures, evidentiary rulings, identification testimony, the sufficiency of the evidence, and the especially cruel aggravator. It concludes that the trial court’s rulings shown in the truncated text did not constitute reversible, fundamental, or constitutional error. Because the opinion’s tail and final disposition are not shown, the disposition cannot be determined.