U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
United States v. Reynoso
August 24, 2026
Summary
The court affirmed the district court's civil-contempt order because Reynoso failed to identify a genuine dispute of material fact requiring an evidentiary hearing. Service of the seizure warrant on Reynoso's attorney, who agreed to accept it on his behalf, provided the relevant notice, and Reynoso produced no evidence disputing his ability to comply or the other contempt requirements.