United States v. Travis Demond Rollins

Summary

The court affirmed Rollins's convictions, holding that he could not invoke attorney-client privilege over communications with counsel for his company, that the district court properly answered the jury's questions, and that sufficient evidence supported the aggravated-identity-theft and PPP-related wire-fraud convictions. It dismissed the restitution appeal as moot because the government had already credited Rollins for the returned funds, except for a $1,000 assessment.