Sgci Holdings Iii LLC v. FCC

Summary

The court affirmed dismissal of all claims. It held that the appellants lacked standing to seek prospective relief against the FCC because they did not plausibly allege a substantial risk of recurring racial discrimination, while their claims against private appellees failed on the merits because the complaint did not plausibly allege racial animus or tortious interference based on a legally protected expectancy. The court also held that the statutory review scheme did not deprive the district court of jurisdiction over the claims against private appellees.